\n');
}
// Use to put a message in the bottom of the browser when the cursor
// passes over certain text or a certain graphic.
function postStatus(statusMessage){
window.status=statusMessage
return true
}
// Use to pop up the e-mail menu
function sendEMail(myLevel) {
// myLevel is the level from which this is called. If it is at the top
// level (equal with index.htm), myLevel=1. If it is in a folder below
// that, it is level 2. And so forth.
var thePrefix = ""
for (i=1; i INTRODUCTION TO THE BOOK OF HOSEA THE MESSAGE OF CHAPTERS 1-3 THE MESSAGE OF CHAPTERS 4-14 THE BROKEN COVENANT: THE DISINTEGRATION OF SOCIETY THE BROKEN COVENANT: THE RELIGIOUS CORRUPTION THE BROKEN COVENANT: “RETURN TO THE LORD YOUR GOD” THE BROKEN COVENANT: GOD’S JUDGMENT THE RESTORATION OF THE COVENANT: FUTURE HOPE HOSEA'S USE OF ISRAEL'S ANCIENT TRADITIONS APPENDIX: THE CHURCH'S VIEW OF A SUFFERING GOD We will now turn to the rest of the book of Hosea to see how the themes introduced
in chapters 1-3 are developed. The heart of Hosea’s message is the marriage
(covenant) relationship between Yahweh and Israel. Unlike Amos, Hosea says little about injustice and oppression. This is not
because these problems no longer existed, we can safely assume that matters
became worse as the years passed. Hosea’s primary aim was to expose
the way in which Canaanite religion had destroyed the faith and life of Israel.
4:1-3 This collection of his oracles commences with a general indictment
of the nation. Note what Hosea says in this damning criticism and compare it
with the Ten Commandments in Exodus 20: The Ten Commandments are the foundational requirements of the covenant relationship
God established with Israel. The indictment is therefore a charge that Israel
has broken the covenant. The problem is that Israel has “no knowledge
of God”. Knowing God in the Old Testament means to know him in a personal
way but in the eighth century Israel no longer knew God in such a manner.
(The NIV translates it as no acknowledgment of God which does not bring out
the personal aspect as clearly). Not knowing God resulted in a collapse of
social morality shown in improper oaths, murder, adultery, stealing and lying. Note what is said about Israel’s society in 7:1-6; 10:13; 12:2. The collapse in personal morality flowed inevitably from the adoption of Canaanite
practice and thought. Note what is said in 4:13-18 about the immorality of men
and women. What do vv 12-13a, 17 identify as the cause of the immorality? The Canaanite fertility religion involved religious prostitution because of
the belief that through sympathetic magic sexual acts with sacred prostitutes
(male and female) at the temples caused the gods to bring fertility to people,
animals and soil. This religion was attractive to the people of Israel because
of its sensuality and offer of wealth and power. In addition, Ba‘al made
no moral demands on his worshippers. Incorporating temple prostitution into
worship inevitably led to immorality in all aspects of society. (Sympathetic
magic operates on the principle of analogy and underlies the practice of black
magic or voodoo.) Verse 12 refers to idolatry and magic. Instead of enquiring of Yahweh they
turned to Canaanite gods and to divination using pieces of wood. These activities
were carried out on the tops of hills (closer to the gods) where there were
shady trees. Such trees had a sacred significance for the Canaanites but Hosea
polemically says their only value was for shade. Some years ago Richard Foster wrote the book “Money, Sex and Power”
about contemporary western society. What are the signs of these goals in our
society? To what extent are they evident in contemporary Christian life? What
should we do to maintain the highest standards of personal integrity in these
areas? The first of the ten principles of the covenant is “You shall have no
other gods before me”. In the time of Hosea Canaanite practices had overwhelmed
Israel’s life and faith. Ba‘al and Asherah had become Israel’s
gods and although Yahweh was still worshipped he was perceived in Canaanite
terms. Canaanite culture had won the battle for the hearts and minds of God’s
people. Hosea announced the shocking news that Israel had become a prostitute (harlot
or whore), betraying the love of Yahweh and loving other gods (her “lovers”).
Making matters worse was the failure of the priesthood to fulfil their calling
as God’s representatives. It was their role to teach the torah, an impossible
task for those who had degenerated to the point that they permitted sacred
prostitution at the shrines under their control. Note what is said in each of the following references about ways in which Israel
adopted Canaanite practices and understanding (fertility beliefs, prostitution):
2:5-13; 4:12-18 (dealt with above); 7:14; 10:1-2; 13:1-2. To understand 7:14
note what is said in Deut 14:1 and 1 Kings 18:27-30. Self-mutilation was carried
out to bring a favourable response from the deity to the request of the worshipper
(religious self-mutilation is still practised today by various religious groups).
Apart from the above references, note other references where Hosea refers to
Israel’s prostitution (whoredom). Like Amos, Hosea attacked the Bethel sanctuary whose most abhorrent feature
was the golden calf set up by Jeroboam I (1 Kings 12:25-30). What does Hosea
announce in 8:4-6; 10:5-6 and 13:2? Beth-aven (house of wickedness) in 10:5
is Hosea’s derogatory term for Beth-el (house of God). RE Clements, “Israel’s worship and the Pre-Exilic Prophets”,
Prophecy and Covenant (SCM Press: London, 1965) 92-97 J Lindblom, Prophecy in Ancient Israel (Basil Blackwell:1967) 351-356 - a discussion
of the attitude of the eighth century prophets to Israel’s official cult. In Hosea’s day the people were very religious, carefully celebrating
the various festivals and bringing sacrifices. Note what is said in 2:11,
13; 5:6; 6:6 and 10:1 about their religious activity. Despite the apparently healthy religious life, Hosea attacked the worshippers
and priests. What do we learn from 4:6-9; 5:1 and 6:9 about the role and degradation
(some of it is hard to imagine) of the priests? What do we learn from 6:4-6 about God’s perplexity over Judah and Israel
(Ephraim) and what he expects from his people? What is his objection to their
sacrifices? BW Anderson, “What the Lord Requires: Covenant loyalty” in The
Eighth Century Prophets (Fortress: 1978) 47-57 has been provided. Part of the
discussion is how to interpret 6:1-3. Hubbard (Hsea, p 125) and Anderson (The
Eighth Century Prophets, pp 52-53) believe it is an empty confession on the
part of the people because it lacks confession of sin and in vv 4-5 God expresses
his frustration at their fickleness. G Smith (Hosea/Amos/Micah, pp 110-111)
believes it was a prayer composed by Hosea for the people in the hope that they
will make it their own. The book of Hosea and history reveal that few did so.
Whichever view we adopt, vv 1-3 are not a genuine heartfelt act of repentance
by the nation (hence vv 4-6). Jesus quotes Hosea 6:6 in Matt 12:7. What is the context in which he does
this? Identify similar contemporary situations. Hosea saw that what was needed was a change in the heart of the people. This
could only happen if they returned to God. The problems stemmed from the fact
that they did not know him (4:1b). Note what is said in eg. 4:12b, 16a, 18b; 5:4; 5:15; 6:4, 6; 7:14a; 10:4,
12; 11;12a; 12:6; 14:1-3 about the inner disposition of the people and what
God requires: What God wants and does not want is stated in 5:15-6:6. In 5:15 God says he
is waiting until Israel returns. In 6:1-3 Israel states that she will return
to the Lord for he will surely forgive. Yahweh’s response in v 4 is one
of frustration and disappointment for he knows that Israel’s words are
not what they appear to be, they are empty and ritualistic and will disappear
like the morning dew. What he wants is faithful love and a personal relationship
with the people of Israel. Like Amos, Hosea declared that Israel was doomed. Her reliance on the Canaanite
gods (eg. 2:2-13) and political alliances (eg. 7:11-13; 8:8-10; 12:1; 14:3)
and a busy cult would not save her from the coming destruction and exile. We have previously considered the threat of God’s judgment in the names
of two of the children Lo-ruhamah and Lo-Ammi and in 2:2-13. Note what is
said in the following passages about the future facing Israel (only some of
the many passages): 5:8-14 An invader is approaching Ephraim. Ephraim was the most powerful tribe
in the north and Hosea sometimes speaks of Ephraim when referring to Israel.
Political alliances will not save her. 7:11-13 Israel’s kings were entering into alliances with
Egypt and Assyria in an attempt to guarantee their security (e.g. Menachem with
Assyria and Hoshea with Egypt, discussed in the historical background). 5:13
also refers to the treaty with Assyria. Note what is said about the coming destruction, particularly in the images
in 9:3, 15-17; 10:7-10; 11:5-7; 13:7-10, 15-16. The reference to returning to Egypt in 11:7 may be a way of saying that Israel
will return to a land of bondage because they will not return to Yahweh. J Bright, Covenant and Promise (SCM, 1977) 78-118 has been provided. Hosea
is discussed at pp 87-94. The immediate future meant devastation but Hosea declared that Yahweh had
a glorious future for Israel beyond this. This restoration had its origin in
the compassion and love of Yahweh (“How can I give you up O Israel?”)
and not in the repentance of the people for Hosea was convinced that they were
incapable of repentance (5:4). Their confession in 6:1-3 would last no longer
than the morning dew. There are a number of key passages describing Israel’s future. We have
looked already at those which occur in chapters 1-3 (1:10-2:1; 2:14-23 and 3:5).
The remaining passages are found in chapters 11 and 14. Hosea is certain Yahweh
will restore Israel but does not indicate when this will take place. Chapter 11 consists of alternating statements about Yahweh’s acts of
love and judgment and Israel’s unfaithfulness. Verses 1-4 present Yahweh
as a parent/father caring for a little child. He had shown his love by bringing
the child out of Egypt and teaching it to walk but was rewarded by rebellion
and ingratitude. This will result in devastation at the hand of Assyria and
Israel returning to Egypt (vv 5-7). This is either a metaphor for slavery and
exile or to seeking refuge from Assyria. This devastation might have meant the annihilation of Israel but this would
not occur. Verses 8-9 are a remarkable and unique revelation within the Old
Testament of the feelings of God as he contemplates the punishment Israel deserves
for breaking the covenant. Israel will be punished (vv 5-6) and will go into
exile (vv 10-11) but if the covenant curses came fully into effect it would
result in Israel’s extinction. He had punished Sodom and Gomorrah and
the adjacent cities of Admah and Zeboiim to the extent that they could no longer
be located (Genesis 19:12-29). But because of his covenant love for Israel he
is unable to deal with her in the same way. F Andersen and D Freedman (Hosea,
p 587) comment: “We glimpse the agony in the mind of God as he searches
for some way of evading the response to which he has committed himself in the
covenant curses.” God could not give up on his people. This same tension
is seen in Hosea 6:4 - “What will I do with you O Ephraim?” Verse 9 further describes God’s character. He cannot annihilate Israel
because he is “God and no mortal”, “the Holy One in your midst”.
Unlike human beings whose love and patience are limited, he could not abandon
Israel even though they had forfeited his love by their unfaithfulness. It would
be contrary to his nature as God to totally destroy those to whom he had pledged
himself in the marriage (covenant). He will show an even greater love than had
Hosea with his wife. It is significant that God’s holiness is here defined in terms of his
unfailing love not his power and transcendence. E Achtemeier (Minor Prophets
I, p 95) writes: “Yahweh of Israel is the ‘holy’ God, which means that God
is more completely different than anyone or anything else – totally and
qualitatively different from all human beings and from everything in all creation.
God’s holiness is his divinity, that which distinguishes him as God. And
because he is holy he is inexhaustible love (cf. 1 John 4:8, 16). That is the
nature, the divinity of God which he cannot set aside, even in the face of Israel’s
total unfaithfulness and refusal to return his love.” Spend time thinking about Hubbard’s comment (Hosea, p 195): “The
apostle Paul prayed for his fellow believers to abound in love in order that
their hearts might be ‘unblameable in holiness’ (1 Thess 3:12-13).
John captured the essence of God’s being with ‘God is love’
(1 John 4:16). Holy love, loving holiness – these are the phrases that
give us the clearest insight that we possess into the divine nature. No-one
except Jesus the Christ has taught us more about this than Hosea.” Chapter 14 The call to repentance (vv 1-3) and the salvation oracle (vv 4-7) define the
way forward for Israel. It does not mean the judgment will not take place,
Hosea saw that it was inevitable and imminent but there is a way to find Yahweh,
to “know him” in a way lacking in the eighth century (4:1). Yahweh
will graciously love and heal Israel. The restoration theme has been sounded
in the changed names of the children, in the ‘courting’ of Israel
in the wilderness (2:14-23), in 11:8-9 but is developed here in the form of
a love song. What does God require of Israel (vv 2-3)? The promise of v 4 is explained by the images of vv 5-7. God’s presence
will be like the life-giving dew which was so important for Israel’s agriculture.
Israel will no longer be like a parched land but in concepts reminiscent of
the Garden of Eden and the Song of Solomon she is described as a bountiful and
fragrant garden, flourishing in his presence. In v 8 there is a final comment
on Israel’s unfaithful behaviour. The fertility Yahweh will create is
a rebuke to Israel of the eighth century who was relying on the supposed power
of Baal to promote fertility (chapter 2). Hubbard (Hosea, pp 229-230) describes
vv 5-7 as a love song in which Yahweh the Husband declares his love to his Bride,
a fitting conclusion to the story of the love of Yahweh for Israel and Hosea
for his wife. J Bright, Covenant and Promise (SCM, 1977) 78-118 has been provided. Hosea
is discussed at pp 87-94. JL Mays (Hosea, pp 7-14) also has a helpful discussion
(not provided). Hosea’s understanding of Israel was rooted in the traditions concerning
the patriarchs, exodus, wilderness wanderings, the conquest of the land and
the covenant at Sinai. The covenant with David is mentioned once and only briefly
while Jerusalem is not mentioned. This is not surprising in light of his preaching
to the Northern Kingdom. Mays (Hosea, p 10) states that “no prophet is better informed than Hosea
about Israel’s history, or uses historical tradition more for the stuff
of his kerygma. The definitive period of Israel’s existence was the time
of the Exodus and the wilderness and conquest.” Hosea speaks of a recapitulation
of Israel’s history. The first period was in the wilderness when Israel
worshipped only Yahweh but at the edge of the land they flirted with Baal, beginning
a second stage which was a history of sin. Yahweh would bring this stage to
an end by a devastating judgment by which he “would bring the career of
faithlessness to a disastrous conclusion so that it could not possible continue.
Then he would take the people back to their primary history, to the wilderness,
where they would learn again to be his people (2:14f.). From there he would
give them the land again.” Yahweh had shown his love in bringing Israel, his little child, out of Egypt
and continuing to care for it. The response had been increasing unfaithfulness
(11:1-4). Hosea reminds Israel in 13:1-4 that they had known Yahweh from the
time they were in Egypt, he had been their only God and saviour. He had cared
for them in the barren desert, providing food and water and guiding them by
day and night. He provided abundantly for them in the land (of milk and honey)
but in their abundance they forgot who was providing it (and attributed it to
Ba‘al, cf. 2:5-13). Israel had been warned against this (Deut 8:10-20). Israel’s faithlessness was seen in the wilderness when Yahweh first made
Israel his people (9:10). Israel and his relationship with her were rare and
special, like grapes found in the barren desert or the first fruit on the fig
tree. But something terrible happened as the men of Israel gave themselves over
to Baal through sexual rites with Moabite and Midianite women (read Num 25:1-5).
Israel had broken the covenant (6:7; 8:1). In 4:1-3 Hosea brings a law-suit
against Israel and the indictment lists violations which mirror the covenant
stipulations found in the Decalogue: no improper oaths, no false witness, no
stealing, no murder and no adultery. In addition the people lack the covenant
qualities of faithfulness, covenant loyalty and knowledge of God. The breaking
of the covenant is revealed in the name of the third child “Not my People”,
the opposite of covenant terminology – “I will be your God and you
will be my people.” For Hosea the covenant was a marriage where the wife
had been unfaithful to her husband. Israel’s history in the land was a history of sin. The sin at Gibeah
(9:9; 10:9) refers to the rape and murder of the woman (Judges 19). Eighth century
Israel had reached the same depths of degradation. Israel’s failure can even be traced back to the patriarchs (12:2-4).
Jacob had cheated his brother Esau out of the family blessing (Gen 27:35-36)
which Hosea traces to the time of their birth (Gen 25:21-26) when Jacob grasped
Esau’s heel. Israel was like her ancestor. But Hosea goes on to use the
Jacob narratives to challenge Israel to meet with God, just as Jacob had when
he “wrestled with God” (Gen 32:22-32) and encountered him in a dream
at ancient Bethel (Gen 28:10-22). The return to the wilderness is described in 2:14-23 and 12:9. In 12:9 Yahweh
identifies himself as the one who had brought them out of Egypt. Now, in what
is best understood as an act of judgment, he will take them out of the Promised
land and away from their established homes and agriculture. They will go back
to the privations of the desert and live in temporary dwellings as they now
did once a year at the Feast of Tabernacles. The normally joyous Feast of Tabernacles
will become a time of sorrow in the desert. In 2:14-23 the recapitulation of
the wilderness experience is described in greater detail. Stripped bare of all
that she enjoyed in the land, Israel will now encounter Yahweh as her lover
who, having judged her, seeks to win back her love for him. Further comment
on these verses is made in the previous discussion. They will even return to Egypt (8:13; 9:3, 6; 11:5). Bright (Covenant and Promise,
p 92): “It is back to the beginnings – as if the whole of God’s
saving history with his people had been stood on its head, reversed!”
If the return to Egypt is taken literally it refers to the flight of those seeking
to escape the Assyrians. Alternatively the coming exile in Assyria is being
equated to the bondage in Egypt. It is likely that both concepts would be in
the minds of Hosea and his hearers. Hosea reveals to us the heart of God and the book concludes with wise advice:
“How can I give you up, Ephraim? How can I hand you over, O Israel? My
heart recoils within me; My compassion grows warm and tender.” “Those who are wise understand these things; those who are discerning
know them. For the ways of the LORD are right, and the upright walk in them,
but transgressors stumble in them.” Some people think of God only as someone who wants to punish them. How would
you go about telling them that God really does love them? THE CHURCH'S VIEW OF A SUFFERING GOD Copyright © 2004 Centre For Distance Learning Bible College of New Zealand
Inc. All rights reserved. OT412 - Part 3 THE BOOK OF HOSEA continued Lesson 9
CONTENTS
Lesson 8:
This Lesson - Lesson 9:
THE MESSAGE OF HOSEA CHAPTERS 4-14:
THE BROKEN COVENANT: THE DISINTEGRATION
OF SOCIETY
Exercise
Exercise
Canaanite Worship
THINK SPOT
THE BROKEN COVENANT: THE RELIGIOUS
CORRUPTION
Exercise
Hosea’s Criticism of the Cult ESSENTIAL READING
Exercise
Verse 7 appears to mean that an increase in the number of priests did not
lead to an increase in instruction in God’s requirements but to an increase
in sinning because the priests themselves were so sinful. They even benefited
from the sin of the people because Levitical law permitted them to eat part
of the sin offerings – the more the people sinned, the more food they
got. Therefore why should they seek to help people turn from their sin (v
8)? Hosea declares that priest and people will receive the same punishment
(v 10). Exercise
Why is Israel’s worship unacceptable (8:11-14)?
ESSENTIAL READING
THINK SPOT
THE BROKEN COVENANT: “RETURN TO THE
LORD YOUR GOD”
Exercise
THE BROKEN COVENANT: GOD’S JUDGMENT
Exercise
THE RESTORATION OF THE COVENANT: FUTURE
HOPE
ESSENTIAL READING
Exercise
HOSEA'S USE OF ISRAEL'S ANCIENT TRADITIONS
ESSENTIAL READING
THINK SPOT
Appendix: